Tue - Fri 30 Jun 2026 - 3 Jul 2026Past

Archaeoanalysis of Metadata Processing – Hackathon

Hackathon Aachen (RWTH Aachen University, IT Center)
Competition Editors Metadata
More Info →
Registration Closed

Join us for a multi-day event where we will dive into bibliographic metadata. This is a multi-disciplinary event for researchers and students to come together to explore a dataset together, sharing their expertise and building resuable tools and workflows. No prior experience is needed - just bring a laptop! Consultants from DKZ.2R will be on hand to help implement ideas and provide support with data retrieval, cleaning, and transformation.

Event Details

Date: June 30 (14:00) – July 3, 2026 (12:00) Location: Aachen, Seffenterweg 23 / Kopernikusstr. 6 (IT Center) Catering provided | Bring your own laptop

Registration

To help us plan the event please sign up using this form

Event Poster

When Metadata Becomes Data

What can you really do with bibliographic metadata — and how much knowledge is hiding in plain sight? This hackathon brings together researchers, developers, and students from all disciplines to explore the boundary between metadata and research data.

Our shared data source is iDAI.bibliography, a curated bibliographic database maintained by the German Archaeological Institute, comprising around 1.4 million entries. Working with data from outside your own domain is the best way to appreciate just how rich and powerful metadata can be.

All tools and technologies are welcome — the one requirement is that every step is documented and reproducible.

Tracks

(still under development)

Data Retrieval and Cleaning

Retrieve data from iDAI.bibliography, clean it, and transform it into a consistent, reusable format — the foundation for all other tracks. Tasks include normalizing author names, standardizing dates, and extracting a minimal schema across entries.

Data Analysis and Visualization

Take the cleaned metadata further and turn it into insight. Explore co-authorship networks, trace how research topics rise and fall over decades, or uncover publication patterns by language, place, or document type. Produce interactive dashboards, network graphs, or timelines that make the data speak for itself.

Data Transformation (Wikidata & Semantic Linking)

Map bibliographic entries to Wikidata and contribute to an open, global knowledge graph. Link authors, institutions, journals, and topics to existing Wikidata items — or create new ones where they are missing. Tools like OpenRefine, QuickStatements, or custom scripts are all fair game.

Hackathon Focus

Projects will be evaluated on:

  • Data quality – cleanliness, correctness, and robustness
  • Reproducibility – can others re-run your workflow?
  • Novelty and insight – how much new understanding does your work create?
  • Reuse potential – can the community build on it after the hackathon?
  • Communication – clarity of documentation and quality of visualizations

Satellite Event

On June 30, 4:30–6:30 PM, join us for the Battle of the Editors — a playful warm-up competition kicking off the hackathon weekend. → See separate announcement

Organized in collaboration with DKZ.2R, DKZ WiNoDa and NFDI4Objects.

Tags :

Related Posts

Battle of the Editors - Satellite Event

This is a fast-paced, playful competition in which participants use their editor of choice to complete a series of data and text challenges as quickly and accurately as possible. Whether you swear by Vim, live inside Emacs, prefer a modern IDE, or rely on OpenRefine for data wrangling — bring your setup and prove your skills.

Read More
How To: Good Scientific Practice

How To: Good Scientific Practice

“Scientific integrity forms the basis for trustworthy research”, so it says in the Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice of the DFG, the German Research Foundation. As a major funder of research in Germany the DFG, as well as many other funders of research in Germany and the European Union, requires researchers to follow a certain set of rules conducting their research. These rules are called “good scientific practice” and have to be followed by researchers to be viable for funding. According to the guidelines researchers are required to “document all information relevant to the production of a research result as clearly as is required by and is appropriate for the relevant subject area to allow the result to be reviewed and assessed”. But good scientific practice is not done by documenting your research. It also includes i.a. protecting the personality rights of your subjects and handling research data in an appropriate manner by e.g. “back(-ing) up research data and results made publicly available, as well as the central materials on which they are based and the research software used, by adequate means according to the standards of the relevant subject area, and retain them for an appropriate period of time.” This is where Research Data Management (RDM) comes in. Of course RDM is much more than just creating a backup of your data on a USB-Stick and handing it over to anyone asking for it. “Good scientific practice” in RDM follows the FAIR principles:

Read More
Announcement - Call for participation

Announcement - Call for participation

Update (June 24, 2024)

The call for participation is now open! Read more

Upcoming!

The Data Literacy Center Rhine-Rhur is issuing a call for participation in its “rent-an-expert” project! This is a great opportunity for PhD students and early postdocs who are working on research projects that involve data science, artificial intelligence, high performance computing and simulation, to get free support from our expert consultants.

Support can take the form of short- or long-term consulting, depending on the needs of the project. More info will be available shortly!

Read More